Newsweek+Waste Productivity
0

Waste Productivity

A measure of the company's productivity in relation to resulting waste, as compared to other companies in their industry
Company
Industry
Project
search
Year
Answer
Filtered answers
935 Known
+ 0 Unknown
= 935 Total results
Companies Values
NTT DOCOMO+Image
NTT DOCOMO
90.6
% 2014
Praxair+image
Praxair
Connecticut (United States)
87.2
% 2014
Banco Santander+image
Banco Santander
Spain
86.9
% 2014
Centrica+image
Centrica
United Kingdom
82.6
% 2014
Adidas AG+image
Adidas AG
81.7
% 2014
Carrefour S.A.+image
Carrefour S.A.
France
73.6
% 2014
H&M+image
H&M
Sweden
69.1
% 2014
Nippon Telegraph & Tel+image
Nippon Telegraph & Tel
67.7
% 2014
DNB+Image
DNB
Norway
64.3
% 2014
Lukoil+Image
Lukoil
63
% 2014
Kone+image
Kone
Finland
59.4
% 2014
Nomura Holdings+Image
Nomura Holdings
55.7
% 2014
Hyundai Mobis+image
Hyundai Mobis
53.6
% 2014
Volvo Group+image
Volvo Group
Sweden
52.5
% 2014
Reckitt Benckiser Group+Image
Reckitt Benckiser Group
United Kingdom
47.2
% 2014
Endesa+image
Endesa
Spain
44.2
% 2014
United Technologies+image
United Technologies
Connecticut (United States)
42.8
% 2014
Covidien+Image
Covidien
Massachusetts (United States)
35.9
% 2014
Rogers Communications+image
Rogers Communications
New Brunswick (Canada)
34
% 2014
Bank Audi+Image
Bank Audi
30.2
% 2014

Export: csv / json

Metric Type
Researched
Designed By
Topics
Research Policy
Designer Assessed
Report Type
Value Type
Number
Unit:
%
Range:
1-100

About

In the first step, each company's Waste Productivity is calculated for 2012. Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) _ waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)]. Each company_s Waste Productivity is then percent-ranked against that of all Industry Group peers in the CKC research universe and multiplied by 0.75. In the second step, the change in each company_s Waste Productivity from 2010-2012 is calculated and percent-ranked against that of all same-industry group peers within the CKC research universe. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 Waste Productivity is top quartile, their percent-ranked change in Waste Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 1 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 Waste Productivity is second quartile, their percent-ranked change in Waste Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.75 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 Waste Productivity is third quartile, their percent-ranked change in Waste Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.5 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 Waste Productivity is bottom quartile, their percent-ranked change in Waste Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.25 and then by 0.25. In the third step, the values from the first and second steps are totaled.

Bulk Import