| Companies | Answer Year |
|---|---|
United Technologies Corporation
Connecticut (United States) |
Yes
Yes, No
|
L'Oreal
France |
Yes
Yes, No
|
ENEOS Holdings (formerly JXTG Holdings)
Japan |
Yes
Yes, No
|
EMD Group
Germany |
Yes
Yes, No
|
Alphabet Inc
California (United States) |
Yes
Yes, No
|
Masan Group
Vietnam |
Yes
Yes, No
|
Renault
France |
Yes
Yes, No
|
Enbridge
Canada |
Yes
Yes, No
|
Robert Bosch GmbH
Germany |
Yes
Yes, No
|
Sony Group
Japan |
Yes
Yes, No
|
BMW Group
Germany |
Yes
Yes, No
|
IKEA
Sweden |
Yes
Yes, No
|
Hitachi Ltd.
Japan |
Yes
Yes, No
|
Meta Platforms Inc.
California (United States) |
Yes
Yes, No
|
Nokia
Finland |
Yes
Yes, No
|
IBM (International Business Machines Corporation)
New York (United States) |
Yes
Yes, No
|
Prysmian
Italy |
Yes
Yes, No
|
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
Guangdong (China) |
Yes
Yes, No
|
Unilever
United Kingdom |
Yes
Yes, No
|
Procter & Gamble Co.
Ohio (United States) |
Yes
Yes, No
|
In 2020, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) launched a project to develop a methodology to evaluate the extent to which companies embrace the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including how they align with its core elements, the 5-Step framework and the Annex II Model Policy. This metric belongs to that methodology.
The OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (OECD Guidance) was developed to provide recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.
This information will most likely be found in a Responsible Sourcing Policy, Code of Conduct, Sustainability Report or Conflict Minerals Report.
This can be supply chain auditing conducted directly or through a third party.