World Benchmarking Alliance+Image
OCE-C.05.C - Seafarer Conditions Improvement Actions
Does the company demonstrate how it makes improvements to the working and living conditions of seafarers and maritime workers based on monitoring results?
24363492
Researched

About the data

The WBA Ocean Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to halt and reverse nature loss in marine ecosystems, tracking how companies manage their impacts on ocean biodiversity, marine habitats, and the communities and workers dependent on healthy seas. The 2026 edition is WBA's first Ocean Benchmark, assessing 125 companies across key sectors dependent on oceans, including seafood, maritime transport, offshore wind energy, shipbuilding, port operations, apparel, and chemicals. Companies are assessed on 47 indicators across four measurement areas: governance, ecosystems and biodiversity, social responsibility, and core social indicators. The benchmark builds on WBA's Nature Benchmark and the former Seafood Stewardship Index, and its methodology was developed with input from more than 50 stakeholders including ocean communities, companies, scientists and civil society, with human rights and social impacts kept at its core alongside nature-specific concerns. More information can be found here.
Working in the maritime industry is labour-intensive and considered one of the world’s
most dangerous occupations. In fact, fishing vessels alone account for over 24,000 fatalities annually
(FAO, 2016b). Companies and buyers have a critical role to play in enhancing the working and living
conditions aboard vessels and within maritime working environments. They can contribute by
supporting the development and implementation of social responsibility schemes that align with
relevant ILO conventions, both within their own operations and across their supply chains.

Research Guidance:

Building upon element b), for this element to be met the company **must:**

Have developed an improvement programme
OR
Provide evidence that improvements are being implemented through either engaging with suppliers or direct operations.

If the company have monitored compliance for 2020 and implemented improvements in 2022, we need to flag this.
A target for improvement would be enough to meet this element if they have demonstrated that the target is based on results from element b). For instance, if a company has a target of an improvement plan implemented in by 2025.
Key words: compliance, monitors AND improvement, target for improvement.
Topics
Framework Mappings
Value Type
Category
Options
Yes
No
Assessment
Steward Assessed
Report Type
Aggregate Data Report