About the data
The WBA Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to advance digital inclusion, tracking how companies are expanding access to digital technologies, improving digital skills and literacy, and ensuring safe and inclusive digital environments for all. The 2026 edition assessed 200 companies across key sectors of the digital economy including telecommunications, software, hardware, and digital platforms. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, ITU, and the Alliance for Affordable Internet, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where digital exclusion risks are highest and act to bridge the digital divide, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.
More information can be found here.
More information can be found here.
Methodology
SDG target 9.c calls for universal and affordable access to the Internet. Additionally, the Global Digital Compact calls for increasing the availability and affordability of digital technologies for an inclusive, open, sustainable, fair, safe and secure digital future for all.xi Yet the world remains far from achieving this target. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) estimates that 33% of the world’s population – around 2.6 billion people – was still offline in 2023.xii Most of these people reside in low- and middle-income countries, while those who lack digital access in high-income countries are mainly vulnerable groups, such as ethnic minorities, people with disabilities and elderly people.
Company best practices for this indicator involve measurable actions to help those lacking digital access get and stay connected. In the case of telecommunication companies, this could involve offering reduced connectivity prices for those with low incomes. Similarly, hardware companies might provide subsidised devices, enabling digital access for disadvantaged people. Participation in open, vendor-neutral initiatives to lower deployment costs in remote and rural areas is another example. These examples are illustrative, and companies may have other ways in which they support the goal of improving availability and affordability of digital technologies.
Research Guidance:
The company discloses information on the resources invested in its programme, the activities delivered, as well as the immediate results or reach of the programme. This includes but not limited to information on how much money was allocated, donated, or invested in the programme; metrics related to personnel involvement, such as number of volunteer hours, number of employees deployed, or time allocated to the specific programme development or delivery; disclosures of material, technology, or infrastructure provided; participation, satisfaction or engagement metrics, number of people directly reached or supported, number of organisations supported. A company‚s reporting of aggregated metrics for all their digital inclusion efforts is not accepted.
Company best practices for this indicator involve measurable actions to help those lacking digital access get and stay connected. In the case of telecommunication companies, this could involve offering reduced connectivity prices for those with low incomes. Similarly, hardware companies might provide subsidised devices, enabling digital access for disadvantaged people. Participation in open, vendor-neutral initiatives to lower deployment costs in remote and rural areas is another example. These examples are illustrative, and companies may have other ways in which they support the goal of improving availability and affordability of digital technologies.
Research Guidance:
The company discloses information on the resources invested in its programme, the activities delivered, as well as the immediate results or reach of the programme. This includes but not limited to information on how much money was allocated, donated, or invested in the programme; metrics related to personnel involvement, such as number of volunteer hours, number of employees deployed, or time allocated to the specific programme development or delivery; disclosures of material, technology, or infrastructure provided; participation, satisfaction or engagement metrics, number of people directly reached or supported, number of organisations supported. A company‚s reporting of aggregated metrics for all their digital inclusion efforts is not accepted.
License
Topics
Framework Mappings
Value Type
Category
Options
Yes
No
Not Applicable
Assessment
Steward Assessed
Report Type
Aggregate Data Report