About the data
The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.
More information can be found here.
More information can be found here.
Methodology
Meeting the interests of all stakeholders is essential for a business’s long-term success.
Regular engagement with stakeholders enhances the company’s understanding of diverse and often
conflicting perspectives, fosters innovation and facilitates the development of robust and inclusive
strategies. Companies are expected to undertake meaningful stakeholder engagement, which should
yield clear outcomes or actions, as well as transparently acknowledge how stakeholder inputs are
used.The company should disclose at least two systemic actions taken in response to key issues raised by its stakeholders in the reporting year's engagement. Systemic actions refer to comprehensive and transformative measures that aim for a holistic and sustainable impact, such as actions that cover the majority of the company's locations or business activities, address the root causes of problems, or bring about changes in business models.
Providing only a general description of guidelines or a recap of the materiality assessment is insufficient. Disclosing only the output, such as the number of sessions held, without detailing the actual outcomes and actions, is also insufficient.
If the company links to the relevant chapters to signal their responses, and those responses are indeed systemic actions, it is considered sufficient. The responses must be explicitly linked to the corresponding issues in the appropriate report section.
Regular engagement with stakeholders enhances the company’s understanding of diverse and often
conflicting perspectives, fosters innovation and facilitates the development of robust and inclusive
strategies. Companies are expected to undertake meaningful stakeholder engagement, which should
yield clear outcomes or actions, as well as transparently acknowledge how stakeholder inputs are
used.The company should disclose at least two systemic actions taken in response to key issues raised by its stakeholders in the reporting year's engagement. Systemic actions refer to comprehensive and transformative measures that aim for a holistic and sustainable impact, such as actions that cover the majority of the company's locations or business activities, address the root causes of problems, or bring about changes in business models.
Providing only a general description of guidelines or a recap of the materiality assessment is insufficient. Disclosing only the output, such as the number of sessions held, without detailing the actual outcomes and actions, is also insufficient.
If the company links to the relevant chapters to signal their responses, and those responses are indeed systemic actions, it is considered sufficient. The responses must be explicitly linked to the corresponding issues in the appropriate report section.
License
Topics
Framework Mappings
Value Type
Category
Options
Yes
No
Assessment
Steward Assessed
Report Type
Aggregate Data Report