• Log in
  • RESOURCES
  • Guides
  • API
  • FAQ
  • Recent Changes
  • Report Issue

  • ABOUT
  • About Wikirate
  • Community
  • Data
  • Impact
search
arrow_back_ios
Companies
Metrics
Data points
Sources
Topics
Datasets
Projects
Research Groups
Company Groups
arrow_forward_ios
  1. Home
  2. Metrics
  3. World Benchmarking Alliance+Commitment to obtain free, prior and informed consent
attribution history edit build
Commitment to obtain free, prior and informed consent
Does the company commit to obtain free, prior and informed consent?
23436016
World Benchmarking Alliance
Researched
bookmark 0
  • Details
  • Companies 750
  • Sources 1
  • Datasets 0
  • Calculations 1

About the data

history edit build
The WBA Nature Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to protect the environment and its biodiversity, tracking how companies are reducing their negative impacts on nature and contributing to the protection and restoration of ecosystems, aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. The 2026 edition assessed 750 companies across multiple sectors including agro-food, forestry, building, tourism and the blue economy. The benchmark is developed in close collaboration with an Expert Review Committee and partners including GRI, SBTN, and TNFD, with a methodology designed to incentivise companies to understand where nature-related risks are highest and act to halt damaging trends, while keeping human rights and social impacts at its core.

More information can be found here.

Methodology

history edit build
When companies seek to acquire or lease land for their business activities, it can lead to
relocation and loss of shelter or livelihoods for communities or individual households (IFC, 2012). In
countries where national governance and land administration are weak, local and Indigenous
communities are more exposed to rights violations and displacement (WRI, 2017). Indigenous peoples
are particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts associated with land development projects,
including risk of impoverishment and loss of culture, identity and natural resource-based livelihoods
(IFC, 2012). Protecting and securing Indigenous peoples’ rights has been recognised as crucial to
advancing conservation, restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (WRI,
2019).The company must disclose an explicit commitment to obtaining free, prior and informed consent, including clearly demonstrating whether FPIC was a determining factor for the way in which a project proceeds. Accepted examples include:
Commitment to obtaining (and maintaining) Free, Prior and Informed Consent (for all relevant projects)
Commitment to the [ICMM position statement on Indigenous Peoples](https://www.icmm.com/en-gb/our-principles/position-statements/indigenous-peoples), which includes a commitment to obtain agreement with affected indigenous peoples by following an FPIC process.

The commitment must:
Be a publicly available policy statement (e.g. human rights policy/standards; code of conduct). A statement in a sustainability report is insufficient.
Use sufficient commitment language. The wording used in the commitment must be unequivocally clear that the company strongly commits to obtain free, prior and informed consent. Language that is ambiguous, vague or weak will be considered insufficient to qualify as a clear expression of commitment. For more guidance, please refer to [The Methodology for the 2026 Social Benchmark | World Benchmarking Alliance](https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/research/the-methodology-for-the-2026-social-benchmark/).
The policy should be applied consistently across all locations regardless of law. A commitment to or compliance with local/national laws alone is not accepted. When conflicting with local/national laws, the commitment must explicitly adhere to the highest possible standard.
The policy should cover the company’s own operations and supply chain, or the whole value chain. If the commitment is extended directly to other business relations, the compliance must go beyond an ‘expectation’ or an ‘encouragement’

Examples of weak language leading to unmet includes:
Commitment to respect the rights of Indigenous Peoples to consultation.
Recognition of FPIC as an important process / promoting FPIC, or similar.
Statements with insufficient commitment language. E.g., seeking to apply (the principles of) FPIC / striving to obtain FPIC.
Limitations on when FPIC should and should not be obtained, i.e. ‘where practical’, or only mentioning specific locations.
License
CC BY 4.0 attribution
history edit build
Topics
Framework Mappings
Value Type
Category
history edit build
Options
Yes
No
history edit build
Assessment
Steward Assessed
history edit build
Report Type
Aggregate Data Report
history edit build

Wikirate, an initiative of Wikirate International e.V., is an open data platform powered by its community.

legal

Wikirate Policies Privacy Policy Terms of Use Impressum

contact

Contact us on Wikirate international Subscribe for Updates

follow us


b&w_logoCreated with Sketch.
Unless otherwise indicated, Wikirate's content is licensed under CC BY 4.0, and the database infrastructure under CC BY-SA 4.0.