Page 7: "Our global Human Rights KPI commits to conducting continuous Human Rights e-learning courses (maintaining an attendance rate of 90% or more). We will therefore create updated training for FY24 to achieve this by FY25." This was the only one.

This is tricky because I wonder whether maintaining a high attendance rate for the e-learning course measures the effectiveness of its actions to combat modern slavery. This KPI tells us how many people have taken the course but not what the subsequent outcome has been on workers' exposure to forced labour, for example.

This is a tricky one indeed. Since we have accepted indicators such as "number of employee training provided" in the past, we should accept this one.