We will "assign a" "YES" "to this question if:

• Scope 1 and 2 emissions are clearly published separately by adding the breakdown of the sources of the emissions included in each type

• Scope 1 and 2 emissions are clearly published separately and although their components are not broken down, at least it is clearly indicated which sources of emissions include the data for each type of scope.

 In the case of supermarkets, it is normal for Scope 1 to mainly include emissions from their refrigerant gases and the fuel for their heating and their own transport. Scope 2 emissions would correspond fundamentally to electricity consumption.

We will assign a "NO" if:

• Relevant sources are omitted within each type of emissions, such as that corresponding to refrigerant gases or emissions from own transport within scope 1.

• The company does not classify its emissions according to the Scope 1,2 and 3 names as stipulated in the main GRI, CPD standards or the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol. We require this nomenclature for a better interpretation, homogenization and comparability of the data.

This information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:

• Annual memory

• Corporate Social Responsibility Report

• Sustainability Report

• Environmental Report

• Report on Carbon Footprint

• Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)