Newsweek+Greenhouse Gas Productivity
0

Greenhouse Gas Productivity

A measure of the company's productivity in relation to greenhouse gas emissions as compared to other companies in their industry
Company
Industry
Project
search
Year
Metric_value
Filtered answers
372 Known
+ 0 Unknown
= 372 Total results
Companies Values
Apple Inc.+image
Apple Inc.
California (United States)
96.3
% 2014
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken+image
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken
Sweden
92.3
% 2014
Volvo Group+image
Volvo Group
Sweden
91.9
% 2014
Itau Unibanco Holding+image
Itau Unibanco Holding
90.6
% 2014
Swiss Re+image
Swiss Re
Switzerland
90.6
% 2014
UnitedHealth Group+image
UnitedHealth Group
Minnesota (United States)
90.5
% 2014
Adidas AG+image
Adidas AG
90
% 2014
Atlas Copco+image
Atlas Copco
Sweden
89.4
% 2014
CVS Caremark+image
CVS Caremark
88.5
% 2014
Richemont+image
Richemont
Switzerland
87.8
% 2014
L'Oreal+image
L'Oreal
France
87.8
% 2014
BMW AG+image
BMW AG
87.5
% 2014
Adobe Systems+image
Adobe Systems
California (United States)
87.1
% 2014
Cigna+image
Cigna
Connecticut (United States)
86.3
% 2014
Allergan+image
Allergan
California (United States)
85.2
% 2014
Shire+image
Shire
Ireland
83.6
% 2014
Gilead Sciences+image
Gilead Sciences
California (United States)
83.3
% 2014
Biogen Idec+image
Biogen Idec
Massachusetts (United States)
82.7
% 2014
Centrica+image
Centrica
United Kingdom
82.2
% 2014
Coach+image
Coach
New York (United States)
82.1
% 2014

Export: csv / json

Metric Type
Researched
Designed By
Topics
Research Policy
Designer Assessed
Report Type
Value Type
Number
Unit:
%
Range:
1-100

About
In the first step, each company's GHG Productivity is calculated for 2012, with GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e). Only Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are included according to the GHG Protocol. Each company_s GHG Productivity is then percent-ranked against that of all Industry Group peers in the CKC research universe and multiplied by 0.75. In the second step, the change in each company_s GHG Productivity from 2010-2012 is calculated and percent-ranked against that of all same-industry group peers within the CKC research universe. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is top quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 1 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is second quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.75 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is third quartile, their percente ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.5 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is bottom quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.25 and then by 0.25. In the third step, the values from the first and second steps are totaled and then multiplied by 0.9. In the fourth step, if the company disclosed Scope 3 GHG emissions in 2012, a score of 100% is attributed and then multiplied by 0.1. Otherwise, a score of 0% is given. In the final step, the scores from the third and fourth steps are added.
Bulk Import