Newsweek+Energy Productivity
4

Energy Productivity

What's the company's efficiency in energy use as compared to other companies in their industry?
Company
Industry
Project
search
Year
Metric_value
Filtered answers
958 Known
+ 1 Unknown
= 959 Total results
Companies Values
Jacobs Engineering+Image
Jacobs Engineering
California (United States)
90.8
% 2014
CVS Caremark+image
CVS Caremark
87.5
% 2014
Bank Audi+Image
Bank Audi
87.3
% 2014
ARM Holdings+image
ARM Holdings
United Kingdom
86.9
% 2014
Hyundai Mobis+image
Hyundai Mobis
85.7
% 2014
Glencore Xstrata+Image
Glencore Xstrata
Switzerland
84.5
% 2014
Adidas AG+image
Adidas AG
81.8
% 2014
NTT DOCOMO+Image
NTT DOCOMO
81.7
% 2014
Richemont+image
Richemont
Switzerland
79.2
% 2014
Kone+image
Kone
Finland
73.6
% 2014
United Technologies+image
United Technologies
Connecticut (United States)
71.6
% 2014
Nomura Holdings+Image
Nomura Holdings
70.9
% 2014
Carrefour S.A.+image
Carrefour S.A.
France
68.9
% 2014
Nippon Telegraph & Tel+image
Nippon Telegraph & Tel
68.6
% 2014
DNB+Image
DNB
Norway
68.1
% 2014
Endesa+image
Endesa
Spain
66.8
% 2014
Teva Pharmaceutical Inds+Image
Teva Pharmaceutical Inds
59.5
% 2014
PTT Public Company Limited+image
PTT Public Company Limited
Thailand
59
% 2014
Ashland+image
Ashland
Kentucky (United States)
58.8
% 2014
Rogers Communications+image
Rogers Communications
New Brunswick (Canada)
58.4
% 2014

Export: csv / json

Metric Type
Researched
Designed By
Topics
Research Policy
Designer Assessed
Report Type
Value Type
Number
Unit:
%
Range:
1-100

About

As a first step, each company's Energy Productivity is calculated for 2012, with Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ). Each company's Energy Productivity is then percent-ranked against that of all Industry Group peers in the CKC research universe and multiplied by 0.75. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) definition of "Industry Group" will be used. In the second step, the change in each company's Energy Productivity from 2010-2012 is calculated and percent-ranked against that of all same-Industry Group peers within the CKC research universe. If the company's percent-ranked 2012 Energy Productivity is top quartile, their percent-ranked change in Energy Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 1 and then by 0.25. If the company's percent-ranked 2012 Energy Productivity is second quartile, their percent-ranked change in Energy Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.75 and then by 0.25. If the company's percent-ranked 2012 Energy Productivity is third quartile, their percent-ranked change in Energy Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.5 and then by 0.25. If the company's percent-ranked 2012 Energy Productivity is bottom quartile, their percent-ranked change in Energy Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.25 and then by 0.25. In the third step, the values from the first and second steps are totaled.

Bulk Import