Metrics
A metric is a tool to measure company performance and to compare companies by asking the same questions across several years. Dive deeper with the Metrics Guide.
All Filters
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company describe how it assigns responsibility for implementing its human rights policy commitment(s) for day-to-day management across relevant departments AND does the company describe how it allocates resources and expertise for the day-to-day management of relevant human rights issues within its own operations AND does the company describe how it allocates resources and expertise for the day-to-day management of relevant human rights issues within its supply chain/with extractive business partners?
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company indicate that it has an incentive or performance management scheme linked to its human rights policy commitment(s) for at least one senior manager AND does the company indicate that it covers at least one of the key sector risks that the company considers salient IF that one risk is health and safety, then it must include the health and safety of local communities or workers in the supply chain?
World Benchmarking Alliance
Is the criteria linking the senior manager(s)’ remuneration to the company’s human rights performance is also made public AND does the company indicate that it has reviewed other senior management performance incentives to ensure coherence with its human rights policy commitment(s)?
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company describe how attention to human rights risks is integrated into its broader enterprise risk management system(s) AND does the company provide an example of this?
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company also describe how it assesses the adequacy of the enterprise risk management system(s) in managing human rights during the company’s last reporting year?
The assessment was either overseen by the Board Audit Committee or conducted by an independent third party.
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company describe how it communicates its policy commitment(s) to all its workers, including in local languages where necessary?
Note: In order to get a score of 1, does the company needs to get a score of 1 under indicator A.1.2.a (ie, the company has a publicly available statement of policy committing it to respecting the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work and explicitly lists them in that commitment)
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company also describe how it communicates its policy commitments to affected stakeholders, including local communities and other groups AND does the company provide an example of how it ensures the form and frequency of the information communicated is accessible to its intended audience?
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company describe the steps it takes to communicate its human rights policy down its supply chain or extractive business partners itself OR does the company demonstrate that it requires its suppliers to do so?
Note: In order to get a score of 1, does the company needs to meet the ILO requirements for suppliers/BPs under indicator A.1.2.a Score 2 (ie, the company’s publicly available policy statement also expects its suppliers to commit to respecting the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work and explicitly lists them in that commitment)
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company also describe how its human rights policy commitments are reflected within contractual or other binding arrangements with its suppliers AND does the company demonstrate that it requires its suppliers to cascade the contractual or other binding requirements down their supply chain/ extractive business partners to cascade the contractual or other binding requirements with their business relationships?
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company describe how its workers are trained on its human rights policy commitment(s) OR does the company describe how relevant managers and workers, including those working on procurement, receive specific human rights training relevant to their role OR does the company describe how relevant managers and workers, including those working on security, receive specific human rights training relevant to their role?
Note: In order to get a score of 1, the company needs to score at least 1 point under indicator A.1.2.a
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company meet both of the requirements under Score 1 AND does the company describe the training it provides to suppliers/extractive business partners to help them meet its human rights policy commitment(s) AND does the company disclose the percentage of suppliers or business partners trained?
Note: In order to get a score of 2 for the whole indicator, the company needs to score 2 points under indicator A.1.2.a
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company provide at least two examples demonstrating how it communicates with affected stakeholders regarding specific human rights impacts raised by them or on their behalf?
World Benchmarking Alliance
World Benchmarking Alliance
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company describe its system(s) for tracking or monitoring the actions taken in response to human rights risks and impacts and for evaluating whether the actions have been effective have missed key issues or have not produced the desired results OR does it provide an example of the lessons learned while tracking the effectiveness of its actions on at least one of its salient human rights issues as a result of its due diligence process(es)?
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company meet both of the requirements under Score 1 AND describe how it involves affected stakeholders in the evaluation(s) of whether the actions taken have been effective?
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company indicate that it has one or more mechanism(s), or participates in a third-party or shared mechanism, accessible to all workers to raise complaints or concerns related to the company?
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company indicate that it has one or more mechanism(s), or participates in a shared mechanism, accessible to all external individuals and communities who may be adversely impacted by the company, or those acting on their behalf, to raise complaints or concerns?
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company describe how it ensures the mechanism(s) is available in all appropriate languages and that workers are aware of it (eg, specific communication(s)/training) AND does the company describe how it ensures workers in its supply chain/extractive business partners' operations have access to either the company’s own mechanism(s) to raise complaints or concerns about human rights issues at does the company’s suppliers or does the company expect its suppliers to establish a mechanism(s) for their workers to raise such complaints or concerns AND does the company expect its suppliers to convey the same expectation on access to grievance mechanism(s) to their own suppliers/extractive business partners?
World Benchmarking Alliance
Does the company meet all of the requirements under Score 1 AND does the company describe how it involves affected stakeholders in the assessment process(es)?