About the data
The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.
The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.
The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.
Methodology
This metric is asking whether the company provides extra information about their supply chain. This extra information might include gender and migrant compositions of their workforce, or trade union recognition. Start by searching on the company’s website and within their published documents for the company's supply chain disclosures. This might be a supply chain report or a list of suppliers.
Keywords and Search Terms
- Gender
- Migrant worker
- Trade union / collective bargaining
- Supply chain disclosure
- Supplier list
Answer Input
Always include the page number where you found the answer in the Comments field, as well as excerpts from the source where you found the information.
If the company does publish extra information about their supply chain, enter the answer as 'Yes'. Make sure you write in the comments what this extra information is and where you found it in the source.
If the company does not publish extra information about their supply chain, enter the answer as 'No'.
Please note: 'Unknown' is not a possible answer for this metric.