
Companies | Answer Year |
---|---|
![]()
Adidas AG
Germany |
10
0-10
2019
|
![]()
Esprit Holdings Limited
Hong Kong |
10
0-10
2019
|
![]()
Benetton Group Spa
Italy |
10
0-10
2019
|
![]()
G-star RAW
Netherlands |
10
0-10
2019
|
![]()
H&M
Sweden |
10
0-10
2019
|
![]()
Nike Inc.
Oregon (United States) |
10
0-10
2019
|
![]()
Pentland Brands Ltd
United Kingdom |
10
0-10
2019
|
![]()
Lindex
Sweden |
7.5
0-10
2019
|
![]()
Kings Of Indigo
Netherlands |
7.5
0-10
2019
|
![]()
Kuyichi
Netherlands |
7.5
0-10
2019
|
![]()
Stanley and Stella SA
Belgium |
7.5
0-10
2019
|
![]()
Schijvens
Netherlands |
7.5
0-10
2019
|
![]()
Zeeman
Netherlands |
7.5
0-10
2019
|
![]()
Gap inc.
California (United States) |
7.5
0-10
2019
|
![]()
Sainsbury's
United Kingdom |
7.5
0-10
2019
|
![]()
Levi Strauss & Co.
California (United States) |
7.5
0-10
2019
|
![]()
New Look Retail Group
United Kingdom |
7.5
0-10
2019
|
![]()
PVH
New York (United States) |
7.5
0-10
2019
|
![]()
Under Armour
Maryland (United States) |
7.5
0-10
2019
|
![]()
Marimekko
Finland |
7.5
0-10
2019
|
This metric is part of a Clean Clothes Campaign project to investigate wages in apparel supply chains. The project, Filling the Gap: Achieving Living Wages through improved transparency, is funded by the European Commission and comprises research, campaigning, capacity building and advocacy around an innovative Transparency Tool.
The Transparency Tool enables users to see at a glance which fashion brands and retailers have the largest gaps between their public commitments on wages, what workers are actually paid, and what they should be paid to be earning a Living Wage in their regional context.
The aim of the project is to empower workers and workers’ organisations to advocate for their rights and equip consumers with the knowledge/evidence that will enable them to make responsible and sustainable shopping decisions, and to hold brands accountable. The resulting increased transparency and traceability, along with the empowerment of workers, trade unions and CSOs, will lead to concrete improvements in these global supply chains.
The research was split into two parts: a survey of the brands and an on-the-ground survey of factory workers, initially in China, Indonesia, Croatia, India and Sri Lanka. This metric is derived from the brand survey portion of the research.
Please note: in the Transparency Tool, this Transparency Score is represented a 4 point scale. However, here the score is represented on a 10 point scale, for the sake of comparability and compatibility with other assessment frameworks hosted on WikiRate.org This means a "1" score in the Transparency Tool is equivalent to a "2.5" score here.
Metric | Weight |
---|---|
50% | |
25% | |
25% |