Filters
2022
BEST & LESS GROUP PTY LTD
Australia
comment
There was no evidence found on the brand’s claims that it pays a living wage and no plausible explanation was given. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
The Iconic
Australia
comment
file_upload
There was no evidence found on the brand’s claims that it pays a living wage and no plausible explanation was given. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
Cassis / Paprika S.A.
Belgium
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
Reima
Finland
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
PP Retail Group
Belgium
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
NP Fashion
Netherlands
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
Fabrimode NV
Belgium
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
ECG nv
Belgium
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
Tokmanni
Finland
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
Artsana S.p.A.
Italy
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
Peek & Cloppenburg
Germany
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
Kuyichi
Netherlands
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
LaDress
Netherlands
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
Van de Velde
Belgium
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
Country Road Group
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
Kesko Corporation
Finland
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
Expresso
Netherlands
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
Wibra Supermarkt B.V.
Netherlands
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
Gymshark Limited
United Kingdom
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.
2022
Kings Of Indigo
Netherlands
comment
The brand makes no claim and no public evidence was found that its suppliers are paying a living wage. Which means the brand cannot prove that the workers making their clothes do earn enough to live on.