Clean Clothes Campaign+Factory Disclosure

Factory Disclosure

Does the company disclose all authorized production units and processing facilities part of its supply chain, and if so, which information?

Metric value
Filtered answers
70 Known
+ 2 Unknown
= 72 Total results
Companies Values
Bestseller AS
2017 = Unknown
Decathlon Group
2017 = Unknown
2017 = No
Children's Place Retail Stores Inc
2017 = No
Sports Direct
2017 = No
Urban Outfitters
2017 = No
2017 = No
Wm Morrison Supermarkets
2017 = No
Emporio Armani
2017 = No
Carter's Inc
2017 = No
Mango Group
2017 = No
2017 = No
Carrefour S.A.
2017 = No
Rip Curl Group Pty Ltd
2017 = No
Shop Direct Limited
2017 = No
American Eagle Outfitters
2017 = No
2017 = No
Canadian Tire
2017 = No
Ralph Lauren Corporation
2017 = No
River Island
2017 = No

Export: csv / json

Designed By
Metric Type
Research Policy
Community Assessed
Report Type
Supply Chain Policy document
Corporate Social Responsibility Report
Value Type

name , Country , Address and 3 others


Supply chain transparency - starting with publishing names, addresses, and other important information about factories producing for global apparel companies - is a powerful tool to assert workers’ human rights, advance ethical business practices, and build stakeholder trust.

Companies have a responsibility to take steps to prevent human rights risks throughout their supply chains, and to identify and address any abuses that arise despite those preventative efforts. In order to live up to that responsibility, they should adopt industry good practices.

By publishing factory names, street addresses, and other important information, global apparel companies allow workers and labor and human rights advocates to alert apparel companies to labor rights or other abuses in their supplier factories.

An apparel company that does not publish its supplier factory information contributes to possible delays in workers or other stakeholders being able to access the company’s complaint mechanisms or other remedies. Workers and labor rights advocates often expend sub- stantial time and effort trying to collect brand labels or using other methods to determine which companies are sourcing from factories where human rights abuses are occurring. Meanwhile, they lose valuable time and put workers at risk of retaliation and continued exposure to dangerous or abusive working conditions. Such delays re- duce the overall effectiveness of grievance redress mech- anisms that apparel companies and other parties put in place.

Disclosing names, addresses, and other relevant information about supplier factories helps make it possible to determine whether a brand has sufficient leverage or influence in a particular factory or country to achieve re- mediation of worker rights abuses.


Go to the Transpency page of the Clean Clothes Campaign website:
Using the dynamic list of 'Current/Anticipated Disclosure by December 31, 2017 vs. Pledge Standards' you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.

Review the list to determine if the company has aligned with the Apparel and Footwear Supply Chain Transparency Pledge.

If so, review the data sheet to determine which of the following kinds of information it will disclose about all authorized production units and processing facilities part of its supply chain:

- Name,
- Country,
- Address,
- Ownership,
- Product Type,
- Number of Workers

Provide any relevant contextual information in the comment to the metric value.

Bulk Import