About the data
The BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark is an independent assessment of the world’s largest commercial banks, measuring how they respect human rights in their policies, practices, and business relationships. Built on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the benchmark evaluates banks across key themes, including policy commitments, due diligence, remedy, and specific issues such as the protection of human rights defenders, free, prior, and informed consent, and environmental rights.
Why this metric is important: To be meaningful, human rights reporting should go beyond a “ticking-the-box” approach. To show stakeholders that they effectively manage risks of severe human rights impacts, banks should comprehensively disclose how they identify and address these risks, including qualitative or quantitative indicators informing their due diligence. Independent third-party verification through auditing can further enhance the credibility and reliability of human rights reporting, ensuring that this reflects a genuine commitment to respect human rights rather than just compliance.
Why this metric is important: To be meaningful, human rights reporting should go beyond a “ticking-the-box” approach. To show stakeholders that they effectively manage risks of severe human rights impacts, banks should comprehensively disclose how they identify and address these risks, including qualitative or quantitative indicators informing their due diligence. Independent third-party verification through auditing can further enhance the credibility and reliability of human rights reporting, ensuring that this reflects a genuine commitment to respect human rights rather than just compliance.
Methodology
Requirements for full and half score:
Full score: The bankʼs human rights reporting is independently verified and includes indicators concerning how it identifies and addresses adverse impacts.
Half score: The bankʼs human rights reporting is independently verified, or it includes indicators concerning how it identifies and addresses adverse impacts (but not both).
Full methodology can be found in the report.
Full score: The bankʼs human rights reporting is independently verified and includes indicators concerning how it identifies and addresses adverse impacts.
Half score: The bankʼs human rights reporting is independently verified, or it includes indicators concerning how it identifies and addresses adverse impacts (but not both).
Full methodology can be found in the report.
License
Topics
Framework Mappings
Value Type
Category
Options
Yes
Partially
No
Assessment
Steward Assessed
