Given the size of the problem and the complex and far-reaching nature of the supply chains of large companies, it is perhaps not surprising that incidents of modern slavery in supply chains can be common. Companies should present an accurate picture rather than seeking to cover up problems. Revealing these incidents in their statements shows business partners and consumers that companies are taking the issue seriously, and have effective risk assessment strategies in place.
For further information on this metric please refer to the Home Office Guidance, pp. 32-36, and CORE Guidance, pp. 22.
Has the company identified at least one incident related to modern slavery risks?
‘Incident’ (violations, non-compliances) is defined as a case study or description of any case of violation of the company policies or local laws involving an individual or group of individuals. Companies can identify different types of violations, ranging from modern slavery cases to other types of incidents, such as health and safety or payment of recruitment fees.
Because definitions of modern slavery vary, incidents described in modern slavery statements (e.g. recruitment fees) do not always qualify as cases of modern slavery or forced labour, even though they are often considered as indicators or risk factors. This is why we are trying to capture the different categories of incidents disclosed by companies.
Please note, the incident must refer to a specific example, not a general description of risk, which is covered by the metric 'MSA Identification of risks'.
The answer options are the following:
No: If the company did not identify any incidents, or there is no relevant information in the statement, give them a value of “No”.
* Note on choosing the Year of your answer
Read the MSA Statement carefully to find out what year it covers.
When a statement is referring to a Financial Year (FY) ending in Q1 or early Q2, it should be labeled with the previous year. Example: