This was only done for the Australian subsidiary to be compliant with Australian MSA requirements: "This Statement was prepared in consultation with Sunshine A, including by making Sunshine Aaware of its preparation,and providing Sunshine Awith an opportunity to participate therein." (last page)

Since it is partial, the answer provided here was No.

There is mention of consultation with only one subsidiary. Hence, it is not considered.

pg. 5

“Sunshine A Pty Ltd., Australian Company Number 631684770 (“Sunshine A”), a wholly owned subsidiary of PVH Corp., is required to submit a statement under the Australian Commonwealth Modern Slavery Act. Sunshine A, including through its subsidiaries identified below, engages in local sales and marketing and provides related administrative support.”

“This Statement has been approved on behalf of Sunshine A by the Corporate Responsibility Committee of the PVH Corp. Board of Directors, the principal governing body of the ultimate parent of Sunshine A, and the undersigned is an authorized officer and director of PVH Corp. This Statement was prepared in consultation with Sunshine A, including by making Sunshine A aware of its preparation, and providing Sunshine A with an opportunity to participate therein.”