close fullscreen
  1. Home
  2. Metrics
  3. World Benchmarking Alliance+URB-A.01.A - Material Sustainability Impact Identification
attribution history edit build
World Benchmarking Alliance+Image
URB-A.01.A - Material Sustainability Impact Identification
Does the company identify material sustainability impacts across its operations and value chain?
24444865
World Benchmarking Alliance
Researched
bookmark 0
  • Details
  • Companies 300
  • Sources 1
  • Datasets 0
  • Calculations 1

About the data

history edit build
The WBA Urban Benchmark measures and ranks the world's most influential companies on their efforts to shape sustainable, inclusive and resilient urban environments, tracking how companies address essential urban needs while respecting planetary boundaries across dimensions including decent work and human rights, environmental and climate impacts, social inclusion, and sustainability leadership. The 2026 edition assessed 300 companies across four key industries shaping urban environments: real estate, construction and engineering, transport, and utilities. Companies were scored on 24 urban-specific indicators plus 18 core social indicators, spanning four measurement areas: sustainable governance, inclusive cities, healthy cities, and climate change and resilient cities. The benchmark is designed to incentivise the private sector to take adequate responsibility for its role in ensuring affordable, safe and inclusive urban environments for all. More information can be found here.

Methodology

history edit build
Impact materiality assessments allow companies to identify and prioritise their most
significant environmental, social and governance impacts. Embedding the results into their
sustainability strategy ensures that companies address these critical areas effectively, enhancing their
long-term resilience and aligning the company’s operations with the SDGs.


Research Guidance

The company must conduct an impact or sustainability materiality assessment and meet both of the following aspects:

The company must disclose material impacts across its operations and value chain.
The organization must describe the criteria, sources or evidence it has used to identify and judge the materiality of the impacts. It must be clear that identified material sustainability impacts are based on actual or potential impacts, not merely the result of stakeholder preferences.

Examples of criteria:
Magnitude of impact
Likelihood of impact
Duration of impact
Severity or irreversibility

Examples of sources and external standards and frameworks:
Publicly available company data and reports
Academic and scientific research
Industry best practices
NGO reports
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): Provides guidelines for materiality assessments and impact reporting
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB): Industry-specific standards for material sustainability issues
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD): Focused on climate risks and impacts.
Task Force on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD): Focused on environmental risks and impacts
United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Identifies key global challenges that businesses can align with.
Guidance from regulatory bodies (e.g., European Commission's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive)

Types of evidence:
Scenario and impact modelling
Third-party audits
Benchmark data
Quantitative data: e.g. measurements
Qualitative data: e.g. interviews, case studies
License
CC BY 4.0 attribution
history edit build
Topics
Framework Mappings
Value Type
Category
history edit build
Options
Yes
No
history edit build
Assessment
Steward Assessed
history edit build
Report Type
Aggregate Data Report
history edit build