The MSA Transparency statement links to a complaint process protocol for third parties and directly affected parties (https://www.adidas-group.com/media/filer_public/dd/67/dd6737b9-cbfd-4859-9735-74500d3a24d9/third_party_complaint_process_adidas_august_2021.pdf).

'Effective grievance mechanisms

We deploy an operational grievance mechanism at our strategic supplier sites. In 2021, more than 600,000 workers employed in 123 manufacturing facilities across 18 countries had access to this digital system, reflecting a 99% coverage of strategic manufacturing partners.

...

In addition to our digital grievance system, we also run worker hotlines and an overarching human rights third party complaint mechanism, which is accessible to anyone, anywhere.' - 7 (Appendix A pg 2), internal and external grievance mechanisms.

No explicit mention of whistleblowing, protections, or a focal point within the statement itself.

pg. 3

“In alignment with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, we continue to ensure access to effective grievance mechanisms within our business and supply chain. We have implemented dedicated third-party grievance channels to address complaints. adidas’ Human Rights Complaint Process is accessible to all external stakeholders who have a grievance to share. See here: https://www.adidasgroup.com/media/filer_public/dd/67/dd6737b9-cbfd-4859-9735- 74500d3a24d9/third_party_complaint_process_adidas_august_2021.pdf Supply chain workers also have access to an operational grievance channel at a factory level, a mobile application-based ‘Workers Voice’ platform.”