This sub-metric is used to evaluate the metric : ""2.7 Management of containers and packaging""
With this metric we evaluate companies' efforts in packaging management by focusing on their actions on recycling, reduction and reuse, use of sustainable materials, publication of their data, prevention and education.
With this metric we evaluate companies' efforts in packaging management by focusing on their actions on recycling, reduction and reuse, use of sustainable materials, publication of their data, prevention and education.
We value in this metric the measures aimed at reducing or eliminating unnecessary packaging such as:
- increase bulk sales of products such as legumes, frozen foods, beverages, etc.
- unpacking fruits and vegetables (it is not worth replacing plastic with biodegradable / compostable)
- install dispensers and / or implement returnable containers that avoid the accumulation of disposable containers
- remove trays for meat, fish, ...
We will also assess with a YES if there is a firm commitment on the part of the company to eliminate overpackaging of its products by 2025 (Eroski is an example in this regard).
We will assign a "" YES "" to this question if:
- Scope 1 and 2 emissions are clearly published separately by adding the breakdown of the sources of the emissions included in each type
We will assign a "NO" if:
- Relevant sources are omitted within each type of emissions, such as
This information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:
- Annual memory
- Corporate Social Responsibility Report
- Sustainability Report
- Environmental Report
- Report on Carbon Footprint
- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)
- increase bulk sales of products such as legumes, frozen foods, beverages, etc.
- unpacking fruits and vegetables (it is not worth replacing plastic with biodegradable / compostable)
- install dispensers and / or implement returnable containers that avoid the accumulation of disposable containers
- remove trays for meat, fish, ...
We will also assess with a YES if there is a firm commitment on the part of the company to eliminate overpackaging of its products by 2025 (Eroski is an example in this regard).
We will assign a "" YES "" to this question if:
- Scope 1 and 2 emissions are clearly published separately by adding the breakdown of the sources of the emissions included in each type
We will assign a "NO" if:
- Relevant sources are omitted within each type of emissions, such as
This information can be found in any of the following reports published on the companies' website:
- Annual memory
- Corporate Social Responsibility Report
- Sustainability Report
- Environmental Report
- Report on Carbon Footprint
- Non-Financial Information Statement (EINF)
Topics