Walk Free Foundation+MSA risk management (revised)
0

MSA risk management (revised)

Does the company continuously monitor suppliers to ensure that they comply with the company’s policies and local laws?

Company
Industry
Project
search
Year
Metric value
Companies Values
Homebase Limited
2016 = Unknown
H&M
2017 = Unknown
Midland Foods Ltd
2017 = Unknown
Nisbets plc
2017 = Unknown
British Museum
2016 = Unknown
Bellway plc
2017 = Unknown
IBI Group Inc.
2016 = Unknown
Ted Baker
2017 = Unknown
Harvey Nichols Group
2016 = Unknown
Groupe EUROTUNNEL
2017 = Unknown
Henry Boot
2017 = Unknown
August Storck KG
2017 = Unknown
J&P Building Systems Ltd.
2016 = Unknown
Yazaki Corporation
2017 = Unknown
Ossur UK Ltd
2016 = Unknown
Kingsland Drinks Ltd
2017 = Unknown
JTI UK Ltd
2017 = Unknown
Lyons Seafoods
2016 = Unknown
Hackett Limited
2017 = Unknown
Bose Limited
2016 = Unknown

Export: csv / json

Designed By
Topics
Metric Type
Researched
Research Policy
Community Assessed
Report Type
Modern Slavery Statement
Value Type
Multi-Category
Options:

Audits of suppliers (self- reporting) , Audits of suppliers (independent) , On-site visits (self- reporting) and 3 others


About

Human rights due diligence is a key concept in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Due diligence processes should include ‘assessing actual and potential human rights impacts, integrating and acting upon the findings, tracking responses, and communicating how impacts are addressed.’ (See the UN Guiding Principles). Part of due diligence processes is not just assessing initial risk through questionnaires or having in place policies, but monitoring this risk through continuous engagement with suppliers.

For further information on this metric please refer to the Home Office Guidance, pp. 32-33, and the Walk Free Foundation Guidance, pp. 37-39.

Methodology

Does the company manage the risk of modern slavery by continuously engaging with suppliers?

This continuous engagement can include:

  1. conducting audits of suppliers (including high risk suppliers),

  2. providing suppliers with continuous improvement programs,

  3. providing suppliers with correction action plans, or equivalent, and

  4. conducting on site visits of suppliers.

Please select as many examples of continuous engagement as may apply.

In some instances, these mechanisms are conducted by the suppliers or company themselves, or are conducted independently. If continuous engagement is conducted by the company itself or the supplier, please select the value with (self- reporting). If continuous engagement is conducted by a third party, or an external, independent agency, please select (independent) value.

If no such continuous engagement is described, then please select “No”.

If the business indicates it is developing continuous engagement mechanisms, or planning to implement these in the future, please indicate “In Development”.

For each value, please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement. If the example of continuous engagement that you wish to include is not listed, please add a comment and flag the section for review.

expand_more Example for “Audits (independent)” value

expand_more Example for “In Development” value

Bulk Import