Newsweek+Greenhouse Gas Productivity
0

Greenhouse Gas Productivity

A measure of the company's productivity in relation to greenhouse gas emissions as compared to other companies in their industry

Company
Industry
Project
search
Year
Metric value
Companies Values
Apple Inc.
2014 = 96.3 %
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken
2014 = 92.3 %
check_circle
Volvo Group
2014 = 91.9 %
Itau Unibanco Holding
2014 = 90.6 %
Swiss Re
2014 = 90.6 %
UnitedHealth Group
2014 = 90.5 %
Adidas AG
2014 = 90 %
Atlas Copco
2014 = 89.4 %
CVS Caremark
2014 = 88.5 %
Richemont
2014 = 87.8 %
L'Oreal
2014 = 87.8 %
BMW AG
2014 = 87.5 %
Adobe Systems
2014 = 87.1 %
Cigna
2014 = 86.3 %
Allergan
2014 = 85.2 %
Shire
2014 = 83.6 %
Gilead Sciences
2014 = 83.3 %
Biogen Idec
2014 = 82.7 %
Centrica
2014 = 82.2 %
Coach
2014 = 82.1 %

Export: csv / json

Designed By
Topics
Metric Type
Researched
Research Policy
Designer Assessed
Report Type
Value Type
Number
Unit:
%
Range:
1-100

About
In the first step, each company's GHG Productivity is calculated for 2012, with GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e). Only Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are included according to the GHG Protocol. Each company_s GHG Productivity is then percent-ranked against that of all Industry Group peers in the CKC research universe and multiplied by 0.75. In the second step, the change in each company_s GHG Productivity from 2010-2012 is calculated and percent-ranked against that of all same-industry group peers within the CKC research universe. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is top quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 1 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is second quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.75 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is third quartile, their percente ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.5 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is bottom quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.25 and then by 0.25. In the third step, the values from the first and second steps are totaled and then multiplied by 0.9. In the fourth step, if the company disclosed Scope 3 GHG emissions in 2012, a score of 100% is attributed and then multiplied by 0.1. Otherwise, a score of 0% is given. In the final step, the scores from the third and fourth steps are added.
Bulk Import