Newsweek+Greenhouse Gas Productivity
0

Greenhouse Gas Productivity

A measure of the company's productivity in relation to greenhouse gas emissions as compared to other companies in their industry

Companies Values

Apple Inc.

2014 = 96.3 %

Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken

2014 = 92.3 %

Volvo Group

2014 = 91.9 %

Swiss Re

2014 = 90.6 %

Itau Unibanco Holding

2014 = 90.6 %

UnitedHealth Group

2014 = 90.5 %

Adidas AG

2014 = 90 %

Atlas Copco

2014 = 89.4 %

CVS Caremark

2014 = 88.5 %

L'Oreal

2014 = 87.8 %

Richemont

2014 = 87.8 %

BMW AG

2014 = 87.5 %

Adobe Systems

2014 = 87.1 %

Cigna

2014 = 86.3 %

Allergan

2014 = 85.2 %

Shire

2014 = 83.6 %

Gilead Sciences

2014 = 83.3 %

Biogen Idec

2014 = 82.7 %

Centrica

2014 = 82.2 %

Coach

2014 = 82.1 %
Designed By
Topics
Metric Type
Researched
Research Policy
Designer Assessed
Report Type
Value Type
Number
Unit:
%
Range:
1-100

About
In the first step, each company's GHG Productivity is calculated for 2012, with GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e). Only Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are included according to the GHG Protocol. Each company_s GHG Productivity is then percent-ranked against that of all Industry Group peers in the CKC research universe and multiplied by 0.75. In the second step, the change in each company_s GHG Productivity from 2010-2012 is calculated and percent-ranked against that of all same-industry group peers within the CKC research universe. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is top quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 1 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is second quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.75 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is third quartile, their percente ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.5 and then by 0.25. If the company_s percent-ranked 2012 GHG Productivity is bottom quartile, their percent-ranked change in GHG Productivity for 2010-2012 is multiplied by 0.25 and then by 0.25. In the third step, the values from the first and second steps are totaled and then multiplied by 0.9. In the fourth step, if the company disclosed Scope 3 GHG emissions in 2012, a score of 100% is attributed and then multiplied by 0.1. Otherwise, a score of 0% is given. In the final step, the scores from the third and fourth steps are added.
Bulk Import