Clean Clothes Campaign+Timeframe Pledge Realization
0

Timeframe Pledge Realization

What is the indicated timeframe in which the company will complete its alignment with the Apparel and Footwear Supply Chain Transparency Pledge?

Companies Values

Aldi Group

2017 = 2,017 Year

Columbia Sportswear

2017 = 2,017 Year

Cotton on Group

2017 = 2,017 Year

G-Star

2017 = 2,017 Year

Levi Strauss & Co.

2017 = 2,017 Year

Fast Retailing

2017 = 2,017 Year

Puma

2017 = 2,017 Year

Esprit Holdings Limited

2017 = 2,017 Year

H&M

2017 = 2,017 Year

C&A

2017 = 2,017 Year

Arcadia Group

2017 = 2,017 Year

Abercrombie & Fitch

2017 = 2,017 Year

Asics Corporation

2017 = 2,017 Year

C&J Clark International

2017 = 2,017 Year

Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd

2017 = 2,017 Year

Adidas AG

2017 = 2,017 Year

Bestseller AS

2017 = 2,017 Year

Benetton Group Spa

2017 = 2,017 Year

Debenhams Retail plc

2017 = 2,017 Year

Asos

2017 = 2,017 Year

Export: csv / json

Designed By
Topics
Metric Type
Researched
Research Policy
Community Assessed
Report Type
Value Type
Number
Unit:
Year
Range:

About

Supply chain transparency - starting with publishing names, addresses, and other important information about factories producing for global apparel companies - is a powerful tool to assert workers’ human rights, advance ethical business practices, and build stakeholder trust.

Companies have a responsibility to take steps to prevent human rights risks throughout their supply chains, and to identify and address any abuses that arise despite those preventative efforts. In order to live up to that responsibility, they should adopt industry good practices.

By publishing factory names, street addresses, and other important information, global apparel companies allow workers and labor and human rights advocates to alert apparel companies to labor rights or other abuses in their supplier factories.

An apparel company that does not publish its supplier factory information contributes to possible delays in workers or other stakeholders being able to access the company’s complaint mechanisms or other remedies. Workers and labor rights advocates often expend sub- stantial time and effort trying to collect brand labels or using other methods to determine which companies are sourcing from factories where human rights abuses are occurring. Meanwhile, they lose valuable time and put workers at risk of retaliation and continued exposure to dangerous or abusive working conditions. Such delays re- duce the overall effectiveness of grievance redress mech- anisms that apparel companies and other parties put in place.

Disclosing names, addresses, and other relevant information about supplier factories helps make it possible to determine whether a brand has sufficient leverage or influence in a particular factory or country to achieve re- mediation of worker rights abuses.

Methodology

Go to the Transpency page of the Clean Clothes Campaign website: https://cleanclothes.org/transparency
Using the dynamic list of 'Current/Anticipated Disclosure by December 31, 2017 vs. Pledge Standards' you can view a list of companies that have taken the pledge.

Review the list to determine if the company has aligned with the Apparel and Footwear Supply Chain Transparency Pledge.

If so, review the data sheet to determine by when the company has pledged to disclose its supply chain information.

Provide any relevant contextual information in the comment to the metric value.

Bulk Import